Hoodoo is a well-recognized magical tradition that condones, tolerates, and even sometimes promotes nonconsensual spells. Its adherents even utilize and prescribe spiritual supplies for domination, control, and enemy works. Because of this, it is very likely for people to question if it is unethical for a conjure worker to cast a spell on someone without their permission?
Every practitioner has to come to their own terms on permission, consent, and such. However, unlike in many Neo-pagan traditions, one rather extreme answer that a practitioner of Hoodoo would give to you would be: "not at all."
A less extreme position would be that while casting spells against other people's will is always pro-tanto wrong, other moral, spiritual, and divinatory considerations can sometimes outweigh the pro-tanto wrongness of manipulative or nonconsensual magic. People from different religious and magical traditions might think it is always wrong. Nonetheless, in Hoodoo tradition, conjure workers are known to weave spells or put roots on someone even if their target doesn't know they're being worked on.
Some countervailing moral factors might sometimes suffice to justify casting spells against others' will on balance. What might such factors include? One obvious candidate would be consequences. For example, the fact that a mother's successful manipulation of her son's resistant attitude and disreputable behavior through the Cast Off Evil spell would save her boy's life. Other factors might also be thought to be countervailing considerations like the intentions. Perhaps the immorality of the son's character, or the fact that he is acting on an evil desire or intent, is a countervailing factor that can outweigh the wrongness of his mother's manipulation.
So are we admitting that manipulation is wrong? Yes, to a certain extent.
In the Hoodoo tradition, we believe that God is also the source of wrongness or evil. Fundamentalist Christians will say no. They argue that man's free will is the source of evil. But didn't God create our free will? And doesn't that make Him the ultimate source of evil? In Isaiah 45:7, God said, "I form light, I create darkness; I make well-being, I create woe; I, Adonai, do all these things." If God isn't the source of evil, what can the Scriptures possibly mean when it tells us that "an evil spirit from God" came upon King Saul (I Samuel 18:10)? Even the prophet Jeremiah declared in Lamentations 3:38 (KJV), that "both bad things and good proceed from the mouth of the Most High?"
Biblically speaking, evil is an expression of the Divine and an aspect of our interrelation with the spiritual world. There is 'evil' in the sense of manipulation, execration, destruction, revenge, or violence – in other words, those aspects of existence in this world that we consider 'bad' or 'wrong' because they hurt us or inconvenience us in some way.
If God employs wrongness or evil in His actions, it is always for a virtuous purpose within the all-embracing scheme of His eternal and sovereign plan. For instance, He sometimes uses affliction to compel people to seek His face (Hosea 5:15). Similarly, He works all things, including trials and troubles, "together for good to those who love [Him]" (Romans 8:28). Humans are created in His own image. Just like Him, we may have any number of reasons for weaving evil, even destruction, and damnation, into the fabric of other individuals' experiences. Calling these actions immoral would mean that God is corrupt too. We are just imitating how the Divine works.
Good and evil, blessings and curses stem from the Divine. God is the sole source of all and is the essence of both good and evil. There is no other force independent from Him. Even a Hoodoo practitioner from the book, Hoodoo, Conjuration, Witchcraft, and Rootwork by Harry Middleton Hyatt, explained that:
"In hoodooism, anythin' da' chew do is de plan of God undastan,' God have somepin to do wit evah' thin' you do if it's good or bad, He's got somepin to do wit it ... jis what's fo' you, you'll git it." (In hoodooism, anything that you do is the plan of God, understand? God has something to do with everything you do, whether good or bad; he's got something to do with it... You'll get what's coming to you.)
In the words of my mentor: "Good and evil descend from heaven. Good can be experienced only as such in our lives. Evil can emerge too from the Supernal One, but actually, it is a concealed good - a good that is subject to how we choose to receive and experience it. God and our willpower can change these heavenly blessings into curses, to subvert these positive energies into negative forces."
So, does it mean even cursing is good?
My mentors explained that even for specific human suffering, which is, in fact, a curse from the Divine and inflicted by His emissaries (destructive angels or demons), one must distinguish between Divine motivation in cursing and human dualistic motivations in punishing. A high percentage of humans punishing behavior is egocentric. With God, all curses are educational. Sometimes losing wealth moves a person forward spiritually. Sometimes a health crisis moves a person forward. These kinds of sufferings are opportunities given by God with the aid of some spiritual adversaries to shake oneself out of behaviors that have become second nature.
As conjure workers, this is how we should operate as well. Our cursing should be educational too. When cursing, we can discover how much ego is involved in human reactions. Intuitively, we know that our cursing or punishing behavior, as mentioned, is egocentric. We should never indulge in egocentric punishment. However, our anthropomorphic concepts of God and the spirit world often project this accusation onto the Divine and the spirits. This should not be the case at all.
In human punishment, there is usually a significant element: "You did something bad; therefore, you should suffer." In Divine or spiritual punishing, the approach is always, "You did something bad. Therefore you must learn your lesson so you will not repeat such actions." In this way, the 'evil' that we are employing in our works, or rather the 'concealed good,' is already being experienced as something other than an expression of the Divine loving relationship with humans.
By contrast, some might still hold that nonconsensual, manipulative, and execration spells are always immoral based on first impressions. And even though some acknowledge that sometimes manipulative or destructive response is a must, they still opt to stay neutral on this kind of topic. But this presumption can be defeated in some situations through reliable spirit communication and virtuous divination. When the presumption is defeated, manipulation or cursing is not considered a sin. On this view, we might say that while manipulative or execration magic is usually wrong, it is not wrong at all in some scenarios. We do not perform any kind of spell or spiritual work without consulting our spiritual community first through any divinatory methods.
It's merely a question of intent; do you want to 'defend' someone against something unjustifiable or 'attack' the cruel cause?
If you are neutral in situations of injustice, cruelty, and bigotry, you have chosen the oppressor's side. Suppose an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse, and you say that you are neutral for the sake of your peace of mind because you believe nonconsensual and manipulative magic is unethical. In that case, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.
In some cases, even if it is not wrong on balance to cast spells on someone without their consent, it would still be morally preferable to avoid it in favor of some other, ethically legitimate form of influence. However, it should always be noted that whether a given instance is immoral will always depend on the facts of the situation, the spirit's advice, and the divinatory result or outcome, and the term itself includes (or should include) no presumption one way or the other.